Laparoscopic liver resection and adjuvant chemotherapy with optimal timing: a step towards survival prolongation in colorectal liver metastasis patients
Letter to the Editor

Laparoscopic liver resection and adjuvant chemotherapy with optimal timing: a step towards survival prolongation in colorectal liver metastasis patients

Takayuki Kawai, Olivier Scatton

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, boulevard l’hopital, Sorbonne Université, UMRS-938, Paris, France

Correspondence to: Olivier Scatton. 47-83, boulevard l’hopital, 75013 Paris, France. Email: olivier.scatton@aphp.fr.

Provenance: This is an invited article commissioned by the Editor-in-Chief Minhua Zheng (Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Minimal Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai, China).

Response to: Ramanathan R, Geller DA. Minimally invasive liver resection—more evidence of oncologic advantage. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg 2018;3:43.


Received: 19 August 2018; Accepted: 04 September 2018; Published: 13 September 2018.

doi: 10.21037/ales.2018.09.03


We are grateful to Dr. Ramanathan and Prof. Geller for their insightful comments on our recent study. Liver resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) has been often performed for resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM), with cumulative evidences of survival benefit against systematic chemotherapy alone (1). The increasing diffusion and accumulation of evidences in laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for CRCLM have revealed its feasibility and operative advantages compared to open liver resection (OLR) such as less intraoperative blood loss, lower or equal morbidity, and shorter postoperative hospital stay (2,3). Recently, a randomized control trial (RCT) showed that LLR was significantly associated with less postoperative complications and short length of stay compared to OLR in patients underwent parenchyma-sparing resection for CRCLM (4).

These findings prompted to reveal the oncologic advantage of LLR for CRCLM. Here, the survival benefit of early return to AC has been pointed out in various studies for large cohorts (5,6). Two studies have evaluated the impact of LLR on the duration between operation and AC initiation. Mbah et al. analyzed major liver resections including approximately 40% of metastases from other origin than colorectal cancer (7). Tohme et al. showed LLR was an independent contributor on early return to AC, however the collinearity between the occurrence of complications and the use of mini-invasive surgical technique was not addressed in multivariate analyses (8). Considering the influence of these analysis methods on AC initiation, further investigation has been required to ensure the advantage of LLR for CRCLM on AC with appropriate timing. In our current study, the superiority of LLR on AC timing than OLR was also confirmed in the whole population. Moreover, the propensity score-based analysis allowed to analyze statistically matched 22 LLR and 44 OLR patients with CRCLM in terms of baseline, oncological, and intraoperative findings, and reinforced the evidence by demonstrating the advantage of LLR on AC start timing independently from cofounding factors (9).

To reveal the underlying mechanism between LLR and postoperative early recovery, we further examined the postoperative laboratory data including inflammatory cytokines. However, no significant difference was confirmed between LLR and OLR groups in our study. Considering the comparable postoperative hospital stay between two groups, less invasiveness of LLR might mainly contribute to accelerate the rehabilitation after discharge, and then allow to initiate AC with the appropriate timing. In the Oslo laparoscopic versus open parenchymal liver resection for colorectal metastases (OSLO-COMET) RCT, LLR group showed significantly higher health-related quality of life (HRQOL) score than OLR group (4). Although the duration between operation and AC start was not evaluated in the RCT, HRQOL score would reflect the early rehabilitation after LLR for CRCLM. Further studies are required to identify the objective indicator of early recovery after LLR for CRLM. Objective assessments of postoperative rehabilitation would enable to provide seamless cancer treatments including AC without delay for CRCLM patients.

Although the solid evidence of survival benefit provided by AC after liver resection for patients with CRLM has not been fully established, it is currently evaluated in the ongoing clinical trials including a randomized phase II/III trial (JCOG0603) comparing postoperative survival of liver resection for CRLM followed by mFOLFOX6 with liver resection alone (10). Development of LLR for CRLM and cumulative evidences have shed light on the oncologic advantage as well as surgical outcome. Future prospective multi-institutional studies will achieve the prolongation of survival after LLR followed by AC with appropriate timing in CRLM patients. Finally, we appreciate again for the valuable comments provided by Dr. Ramanathan and Prof. Geller.


Acknowledgements

None.


Footnote

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


References

  1. Nordlinger B, Sorbye H, Glimelius B, et al. Perioperative FOLFOX4 chemotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC 40983): long-term results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013;14:1208-15. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Cipriani F, Rawashdeh M, Stanton L, et al. Propensity score-based analysis of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal metastases. Br J Surg 2016;103:1504-12. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Abu Hilal M, Aldrighetti L, Dagher I, et al. The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery: From Indication to Implementation. Ann Surg 2018;268:11-8. [PubMed]
  4. Fretland Å, Dagenborg VJ, Bjørnelv GM, et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases: The OSLO-COMET Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2018;267:199-207. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Bos AC, van Erning FN, van Gestel YR, et al. Timing of adjuvant chemotherapy and its relation to survival among patients with stage III colon cancer. Eur J Cancer 2015;51:2553-61. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Dos Santos LV, Faria TM, Lima AB, et al. Timing of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2016;18:871-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Mbah N, Agle SC, Philips P, et al. Laparoscopic hepatectomy significantly shortens the time to postoperative chemotherapy in patients undergoing major hepatectomies. Am J Surg 2017;213:1060-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Tohme S, Goswami J, Han K, et al. Minimally Invasive Resection of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Leads to an Earlier Initiation of Chemotherapy Compared to Open Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2015;19:2199-206. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Kawai T, Goumard C, Jeune F, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis patients allows patients to start adjuvant chemotherapy without delay: a propensity score analysis. Surg Endosc 2018;32:3273-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Kanemitsu Y, Kato T, Shimizu Y, et al. A randomized phase II/III trial comparing hepatectomy followed by mFOLFOX6 with hepatectomy alone as treatment for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0603. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2009;39:406-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
doi: 10.21037/ales.2018.09.03
Cite this article as: Kawai T, Scatton O. Laparoscopic liver resection and adjuvant chemotherapy with optimal timing: a step towards survival prolongation in colorectal liver metastasis patients. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg 2018;3:74.