Clinical practice guidelines for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery
Editorial

Clinical practice guidelines for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery

C. Neal Ellis, Valerie Bauer, Melinda Banister

Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center Permian Basin, Odessa, TX, USA

Correspondence to: C. Neal Ellis, MD. Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center Permian Basin, Odessa, TX, USA. Email: neal.ellis@ttuhsc.edu.

Provenance: This is an invited article commissioned by Editor-in-Chief Minhua Zheng (Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Minimal Invasive Surgery, Shanghai, China).

Comment on: Carmichael JC, Keller DS, Baldini G, et al. Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Surg Endosc 2017;31:3412-3436.


Received: 06 January 2018; Accepted: 01 March 2018; Published: 26 March 2018.

doi: 10.21037/ales.2018.03.02


Enhanced recovery protocols (ERP), also referred to as enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and fast track protocols are standardized procedures and practices that are used during the perioperative period in patients undergoing specific surgical procedures (1). They are reported to improve patient outcomes following a wide variety of surgical procedures. ERP is a component of the quality improvement process and must be continuously evaluated to assess compliance and improve outcomes (2,3). It is also apparent that the improvements in outcome associated with an ERP are incremental with the implementation of only a single component resulting in improved outcomes (4).

Colon and rectal surgery has historically been associated with a high risk of morbidity and complications. Common morbidities included surgical site infection, perioperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), deep venous thrombosis, urinary retention and ostomy complications for patients who require an ostomy. The morbidity and complications associated colon and rectal surgery led to increased hospital stays (8 and 5 days for open and laparoscopic procedures respectively) and higher cost (5). As many as one third of patients were also readmitted after discharge; further increasing costs and decreasing patient satisfaction (6). A 2011 Cochrane review found that use of an ERP, when compared with conventional perioperative patient management after elective colon and rectal surgery, was associated with decreases in overall complications and length of hospital stay (7). ERP has also been shown to reduce healthcare costs and improve patient satisfaction (8). The improved outcomes with the use of an ERP are reported for patients who undergo both open and laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery (9).

Currently published ERP’s for colon and rectal surgery vary widely in complexity and supporting evidence. ERP is usually implemented as a bundle which precludes identification of the relative importance of the individual components. The institution of oral nutrition, the removal of epidural and urinary catheters early in the postoperative period, avoidance of nasogastric tubes and multimodal analgesia are common components of the majority of published ERP’s (2).

The Clinical Practice Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery after Colon and Rectal Surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) by Joseph C. Carmichael, M.D, et al. defines current best practices for improved outcomes after colon and rectal surgery (1). These guidelines are the result of a combined effort by the ASCRS Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee and SAGES Surgical Multimodal Accelerated Recovery Trajectory Enhanced Recovery Task Force and Guidelines Committees. Both organizations are to be commended for collaborating on this much needed update of the prior guidelines published in 2012–2013 (10,11). Since these earlier guidelines, there has been extensive further research and significant advances in optimizing care after colon and rectal surgery. Dr. Carmichael and the joint ASCRS/SAGES work group performed an exhaustive review of the English language literature from 1990–2016. In all, 764 publications with embedded reference were reviewed by the work group and 371 were referenced in these guidelines. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system previously described by the American College of Chest Physicians was used to define the quality of the supporting evidence and for each guideline (12). The supporting literature was reviewed for the established components of a colon and rectal surgery ERP described previously and the more recent additions to most ERPs. Guidelines for the preoperative and perioperative management of patients undergoing elective colon and rectal surgery were developed with the quality of the supporting evidence defined (Table 1).

Table 1
Table 1 Practice guidelines for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery (12)
Full table

The joint ASCRS/SAGES workgroup is to be congratulated for the herculean effort of condensing the volumes of literature on this topic into a concise and extremely usable set of guidelines. However, some of the components deserve further discussion. First is the recommendation that “Mechanical bowel preparation plus oral antibiotic bowel preparation before colorectal surgery is the preferred preparation and is associated with reduced complication rates. 2B.” This is a complete reversal from earlier guidelines. Mechanical and antibiotic bowel preparation is a time tested process that has been reported to reduce the risk of infectious complications of colorectal surgical procedures; surgical site infections and anastomotic dehiscence. In the past, numerous randomized clinical trials comparing preoperative mechanical preparation to no preparation in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery, when combined in meta-analyses, demonstrated no significant benefit from either mechanical or antibiotic bowel preparation. This lack of benefit was thought to be related to stress and starvation of the bowel (13). More recent studies which include perioperative carbohydrates to address the detrimental effects of the bowel prep have demonstrated decreased surgical site infections with mechanical and antibiotic bowel preparation (14).

Thoracic epidural analgesia has long been considered the gold standard for pain management in patients having open colon and rectal surgical procedures in many studies. However, the modest analgesic benefits demonstrated for this modality are countered by the numerous trials, that when combined in meta-analyses, have demonstrated no benefit for thoracic epidural analgesia when compared to other modalities of pain control. Thoracic epidural analgesia may even delay hospital discharge after laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery; presumably because of the associated increased risk of hypotension and urinary complications (15,16). These guidelines address some of the urinary complications associated with thoracic epidural analgesia by recommending “Urinary catheters should be removed within 24 hours of elective colonic or upper rectal resection when not involving a vesicular fistula, irrespective of thoracic epidural analgesia use. 1B.” While not a specific recommendation, transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is discussed briefly as a modality that when compared with systemic opioids is associated with a decreased length of stay for patients having laparoscopic colon and rectal surgical procedures (17). While it is too early to be certain, TAP block has the potential to become the preferred method of pain control following both laparoscopic and open colon and rectal surgical procedures.

The importance of perioperative diet and fluid management is emphasized with 7 recommendations on this topic ranging from clear liquids and carbohydrate loading up to 2 h preoperatively, to goal directed, chloride-restricted crystalloid solutions intraoperatively, to discontinuation of intravenous fluids and starting a regular diet soon after discharge from the post anesthesia care unit. Both excessive fluid restriction and intravenous fluid overload can result in impaired organ function with increased postoperative morbidity, and longer hospital stays. Chloride-restricted, balanced salt crystalloid solutions are preferred to normal saline because of the potential to develop hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis. Further, an increased risk of renal dysfunction, postoperative morbidity, and mortality has been identified in observational studies with the use of normal saline as the perioperative fluid in surgical patients (18).

Postoperative nausea and vomiting and ileus are major causes of morbidity following colon and rectal surgery. Postoperative nausea and vomiting increases hospital costs and significantly reduces patient satisfaction and prevention has been shown to significantly improve patient outcomes. For patients with a high risk of PONV, the use of 3 or more prophylactic anti-emetics has demonstrated the most benefit in prospective studies. There are 6 guidelines addressing this topic. These include a recommendation for “preemptive, multimodal antiemetic prophylaxis in all at-risk patients to reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting. 1A”. Specific agents discussed include dexamethasone, ondansetron (or another 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonist), intravenous acetaminophen, and gabapentin. The use of a total intravenous anesthesia technique is also briefly discussed. The guidelines for prevention of ileus include, sham feedings and the immediate resumption of a regular diet. Chewing gum after colon and rectal surgery has been extensively studies with conflicting results. However, given the limited risk and potential benefit, these guidelines do include a recommendation for gum chewing after surgery. These guidelines also recommend resuming an oral diet immediately after colon and rectal surgery. Feeding started early in the postoperative course can help prevent the complication of ileus. However, it has also been found that too much feeding can overwhelm the gastrointestinal tract, resulting in a severe ileus (19). It would seem unnecessary to institute “sham” feedings when actual feedings are resumed immediately postoperatively.

In summary, the joint panel is to be congratulated for achieving their goal of defining the current best practices to achieve the optimal outcomes in patients undergoing colon and rectal surgical procedures and providing practitioners with very helpful guidelines for the management of these patients.


Acknowledgements

None.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


References

  1. Carmichael JC, Keller DS, Baldini G, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Colon and Rectal Surgery From the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 2017;60:761-84. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Bakker N, Cakir H, Doodeman HJ, et al. Eight years of experience with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in patients with colon cancer: Impact of measures to improve adherence. Surgery 2015;157:1130-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. McLeod RS, Aarts MA, Chung F, et al. Development of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Guideline and Implementation Strategy Based on the Knowledge-to-action Cycle. Ann Surg 2015;262:1016-25. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Day RW, Fielder S, Calhoun J, et al. Incomplete reporting of enhanced recovery elements and its impact on achieving quality improvement. Br J Surg 2015;102:1594-1602. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Kang CY, Chaudhry OO, Halabi WJ, et al. Outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2009. Am J Surg 2012;204:952-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Nagle D, Pare T, Keenan E, et al. Ileostomy pathway virtually eliminates readmissions for dehydration in new ostomates. Dis Colon Rectum 2012;55:1266-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, et al. Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011.CD007635. [PubMed]
  8. Thiele RH, Rea KM, Turrentine FE, et al. Standardization of care: impact of an enhanced recovery protocol on length of stay, complications, and direct costs after colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2015;220:430-43. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Currie AC, Malietzis G, Jenkins JT, et al. Network meta-analysis of protocol-driven care and laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2016;103:1783-1794. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations. World J Surg 2013;37:259-84. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr 2012;31:801-16. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Guyatt G, Gutterman D, Baumann MH, et al. Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: report from an american college of chest physicians task force. Chest 2006;129:174-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Ellis CN. Bowel Preparation Before Elective Colorectal Surgery: What is the Evidence. Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery 2010;21:144-7. [Crossref]
  14. Toneva GD, Deierhoi RJ, Morris M, et al. Oral antibiotic bowel preparation reduces length of stay and readmissions after colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2013;216:756-62. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Borzellino G, Francis NK, Chapuis O, et al. Role of Epidural Analgesia within an ERAS Program after Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Studies. Surg Res Pract 2016;2016:7543684.
  16. Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Nguyen VQ, et al. Epidural analgesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a nationwide analysis of use and outcomes. JAMA Surg 2014;149:130-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Favuzza J, Brady K, Delaney CP. Transversus abdominis plane blocks and enhanced recovery pathways: making the 23-h hospital stay a realistic goal after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 2013;27:2481-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Navarro LH, Bloomstone JA, Auler JO Jr, et al. Perioperative fluid therapy: a statement from the international Fluid Optimization Group. Perioper Med (Lond) 2015;4:3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  19. Andersen HK, Lewis SJ, Thomas S. Early enteral nutrition within 24h of colorectal surgery versus later commencement of feeding for postoperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006.CD004080. [PubMed]
doi: 10.21037/ales.2018.03.02
Cite this article as: Ellis CN, Bauer V, Banister M. Clinical practice guidelines for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg 2018;3:26.